i'm starting to feel the same way about anti-ai purists as i feel about vegans (as a former vegan/current flexitarian and someone generally against ai).
their impact on individuals is more contested. vegans can rant to you for hours about the harmful effects of meat and dairy and the health benefits of a plant-based diet, but at the same time, it is totally possible to have a healthy diet that includes animal products. everyone's body is unique and some people actually find it harder to stay healthy on plant-based diets than others; with certain health conditions, veganism isn't even an option. if you're someone actively trying to put on weight or gain muscle, this is also generally easier to do on a diet including animal products.
in the same vein, anti-ai people will tell you using ai will rot your brain. there is plenty of evidence for the negative impact of regular ai use on our mental faculties, and i do believe this has a larger potential impact on society at large compared to the impact of the average diet of meat-eaters being unhealthy (although the burden on our healthcare system that could be alleviated by promoting and making healthier, more plant-based diets accessible is also an issue worth talking about) – after all, our society is built largely on mental labour. we want our voters (and politicians) to be able to think for themselves.
but it's also entirely possible to use ai in ways that don't rot your brain. you can use it to learn things, or to make certain processes more efficient. i don't really know. i don't really use it. but there are plenty of intelligent people in my life who do use it in some way or another and i would never look down on their intellectual abilities for that. leftists use ai. people with learning disabilities use ai. academics and writers and artists and other intelligentsia and creatives use ai. vegans use ai (and, conversely, many anti-ai people eat meat). i think we need to get over our idea that anyone who uses ai for anything is worse than us.
on a personal level, the only context i have ever used ai in is coding, and that has been very limited. i use vscode, which offers a limited amount of free ai queries each month and since i've been learning javascript through doing projects for my website, i've asked it for help occasionally when i've gotten stuck and couldn't find help through other sources.
some things i've noticed:
also, this is totally random and subjective, but i feel like it is less unnatural to use ai to learn coding than it is to use ai to do almost anything else. coding is the computer language. it makes sense for the computer to teach it, even to generate it. but asking the computer to write a story? to draw a picture? to create a song? those are things so inherently human and non-computer. fake computer brain should not be allowed anywhere near that shit.
that is my current take on the whole ai debate. i think it's good that people continue to talk about it, but people who still think anyone who uses ai ever for anything is evil should probably touch grass. we should be less judgmental of people in general and get off our moral high horses. i still strongly advocate for avoiding allowing ai to encroach on our lives as much as possible, and have respect for people who never use it (just as i have respect for vegans). i will absolutely never pay for anything ai-related, am against things like ai art or using ai for writing emails or being your therapist, and am mad that my job as a writer is being replaced by a dumb robot that strings words together but has no idea what they mean. i miss the days when you didn't have to wonder if everything you saw on the internet was ai-generated. if ai goes bust i will be happy (the fact that no ai company is making a profit makes me gleeful). the end.